Anwar Ibrahim |
- Medical Reports: Judge To Decide On Nov 22
- Isu Hutang Isi Rumah: UMNO-BN Sembunyi Laporan BNM
- Kerjasama: UMNO Umpama Lebai Malang
| Medical Reports: Judge To Decide On Nov 22 Posted: 28 Oct 2010 09:49 PM PDT Dari Malaysiakini Perbicaraan liwat melibatkan Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim bersambung dengan mahkamah mendengar penghujahan daripada pihak pendakwaan dan pembelaan berhubung laporan kimia, termasuk ujian toksikolgi yang dibuat oleh pengadu Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan. Peguam Anwar diketuai KarpLr Singh manakala Peguam Cara II Mohd Yusof Zainal Abiden akan berhujah bagi pihak pendakwaan. Selepas itu, mahkamah akan diteruskan dengan pemeriksaan semula oleh pakar bedah Hospital Kuala Lumpur HKL Dr Mohd Razali Ibrahim. Semalam, pakar bedah Am Dr Razali Ibrahim yang memeriksa Mohd Saiful Bukhary Azlan untuk mengenal pasti kesan-kesan diliwat memberitahu mahkamah, beliau mendapati rektum pengadu itu “kosong.” LAPORAN LANGSUNG 9.07am: Mahkamah disambung semula oleh hakim Mahkamah Tinggi Mohamad Zabidin Mohd Diah. Peguam CaraI I Yusof memberitahu mahkamah hari ini akan akan mendengar permohonan daripada pihak pembelaan bagi mendapatkan nota klinikal dan laporan kimia sama ada ia menepati Seksyen 51A Kanun Acara Jenayah. Katanya, Mahkamah Persekutuan membuat keputusan bahawa dalam pra-perbicaraan kes itu, pembelaan tidak berhak untuk dokumen itu. Karpal berkata mahkamah terlalu bergantung terhadap hujah pendakwaan bahawa nota itu tidak dirujuk, justeru tidak boleh diberikan kepada pembelaan. Katanya, kredibeliti saksi pakar (Dr Mohd Razali) bergantung pada nota tersebut. 9.29am: Karpal berkata hakim akan dilihat tidak melakukan apa-apa sekiranya permintaan pembelaan tidak diendahkan. 9.38am: Karpal juga berhujah laporan ahli kimia tidak dapat diterima apabila pendakwaan tidak mahu memasukkan laporan toksikolgi Saiful sebagai sebahagian daripada bukti walaupun ia dilampirkan bersama laporan ahli kimia itu. 9.55am: Karpal berhujah bahawa melalui nota klinikal itu “kami akan cuba dan buktikan bahawa testimoni saksi pakar akan bercangggah dengan notanya” Karpal menamatkan hujahnya dan kini giliran Yusof pula. 10.03am: Yusof mempertahankan bahawsa nota klinikal hanya akan diberikan sekiranya saksi memutuskan mahu merujuknya. 10.12am: Yusof memberitahu mahkamah, seperti dalam kes pembunuhan, hanya laporan bedah siasat akhir sahaja yang dikemukakan.
10.22am: Yusof berkata, tiada permohonan daripada saksi untuk merujuk kepada nota klinikal tersebut. 10.36am: Seperti laporan ahli kimia, Yusof berkata ia tidak mewujudkan prejudis terhadap tertuduh (Anwar). 10.55am: Sambil memohon membatalkan permohonan pembelaan, Yusof menegaskan pihak pembelaan tidak berhak mendapatkan laporan klinikal kerana tidak menepati Seksyen 155 dan 161 Kanun Acara Jenayah. Karpal memohon masa rehat singkat. 11.16am: Mahkamah bersambung dengan jawatan Karpal. Beliau mengingatkan bahawa menjadi tanggungjawab hakim bagi memastikan keadilan – di mana ia mesti banyak bergantung kepada bukti pakar. 11.24am: Hakim Zabidin menetapkan tarikh 22 November bagi membuat keputusan. Anwar Ibrahim’s sodomy trial resumes today with submissions by the prosecution and the defence on the admissibility of the chemist reports, which included the toxicology test done on complainant Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan. Both parties will also submit on the defence’s application to obtain the clinical notes taken by three Hospital Kuala Lumpur (HKL) doctors during Saiful’s medical examination. Anwar’s lawyer Karpal Singh will lead the defence submission, while solicitor-general II Mohd Yusof Zainal Abiden will argue on behalf of the prosecution. Yesterday, Dr Razali testified that Saiful’s rectum was empty when he inspected the alleged victim’s anus during the three-hour examination at HKL on the night of June 28, 2008. This was despite that Saiful had earlier told the court that he had not defecated for two days after the alleged sodomy act. LIVE REPORTS 8.36am: Solicitor-general II Mohd Yusof Zainal Abiden and deputy public prosecutors Mohd Hanafiah Zakaria and CK Wong are in court. Also present are members of the defence team – Param Cumaraswamy, Sankara Nair and Australian criminologist and forensic specialist Dr David Wells. 8.47am: Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim arrives with his wife, PKR president Wan Azizah Wan Ismail, and daughter, Nurul Nuha. He looks cheery although last night he was on the campaign trail and addressed two ceramahs in Galas. In his early morning tweet on his return from Galas, he called on voters to defend the Tok Guru (Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat) Kelantan government against the BN. The courtroom is still half empty – there are a number of Anwar’s supporters and his aides in the public gallery. 8.56am: Top defence lawyer Karpal Singh is wheeled in by his assistant into the courtroom. 9.07am: Court resumes with High Court judge Mohamad Zabidin Mohd Diah (left) presiding. Solicitor-general II Yusof tells the court that today is for the submission on the defence’s application for the clinical notes as well as the admissibility of the chemist reports on whether they comply with Section 51A of the Criminal Procedure Code. 9.13am: Karpal refers to the Federal Court decision on the defence’s basis in getting the clinical notes. He says the Federal Court had ruled that during the pre-trial of this case, the defence was not entitled to the documents. “However, the apex court ruled the defence could apply documents during the course of trial.” Karpal says the court had relied heavily on the prosecution’s submission that if the notes were not referred to, hence it (the notes) cannot be made accessible to the defence. “However, the court has a wide latitude, and the defence has similar rights to do the case.” He said the credibility of the expert witness (HKL’s Dr Mohd Razali Ibrahim) depends on the notes. 9.29am: Karpal says the judge will be seen as abdicating his duty if the court decides not to entertain the defence application for the clinical notes. “Your lordship will be seen as sitting and doing nothing about it if the defence application is not allowed as truth must prevail.” 9.38am: Karpal (right) also submits that the chemist report is not admissible as the prosecution does not want to include Saiful’s toxicology report as part of its evidence although it is attached to the chemist report. He said the Federal Court had ruled that if a document is to be submitted as evidence, the whole of it must be admitted. “The defence is denied access to the toxicology report, but they want to admit the chemist report,” argues Karpal. “We have been denied our right. Yang Arif (Your Honour) can’t just sit back and not do anything about it.” If the documents, he says, are not admitted in its entirety than the whole chemist report should be rejected. 9.55am: Karpal argues that the defence is acting on a hunch that through the clinical notes "we will try and prove that the expert witnesses’ testimony will be contradicted by their notes". “We want to know the patient’s history. It cannot just be a two-liner as stated in the final medical report," he tells the court. “Even a kindergarten kid can tell a two-liner is not a detailed report. Hence, the court should provide us with the clinical notes for us to prove and possibly challenge the witness testimony.” Karpal ends his submission. It is Yusof’s turn to submit. 10.03am: Yusof maintains that the clinical notes can only be given if the witness decides to refer to it. He said the situation in India, which Karpal had earlier referred to, is different. “What’s important is the experts’ evidence, and not the notes.” 10.10am: Yusof tells the court at the present stage of the trial, it is still the prosecution’s case and it can so chooses which evidence to tender. “It is not yet the defence’s case.” 10.12am: Yusof (right) tells the court as in murder cases, only the final post-mortem report is submitted. “The post-mortem notes is not submitted,” he says. “It is wrong that defence should be given all the latitude as this is the prosecution’s case. The witness (Dr Razali) did not apply to look at the notes.” 10.22am: Yusof says there is no application for the witness to look at the clinical notes. He adds that the defence cannot act on hunch alone, as the defence must show material contradiction and discrepancy to justify their application. “So far, the defence has not shown any material contradiction or unexplained circumstances (to ask for the clinical report) and challenged the witness (Dr Razali’s) testimony.” 10.36am: As to the chemist report, Yusof says it has not prejudiced the accused, Anwar Ibrahim. According to the solicitor-general II, the defence argued that they have been prejudiced because they are not given a copy of Saiful’s toxicology report. Yusof points out that the chemist has yet been called to give her evidence, and the report itself has not been marked as an exhibit. 10.45am: DAP stalwart Lim Kit Siang arrives and sits next to Wan Azizah in the public gallery. 10.55am: In pleading to dismiss the defence application, Yusof says it is not entitled to get the clinical report as it did not fulfil section 155 and 161 of the Criminal Procedure Code. "The witness did not apply to see the clinical report. Furthermore, they had failed to show any material contradiction for them to act on a hunch to disprove the witness testimony. "Furthermore, the defence cannot compel the prosecution to do so." On the chemist’s report, Yusof says the attached toxicology report on Saiful is not related, and would not prejudice the accused. Following this, he asks the court to dismiss the application. Karpal applies for a short break. 11.16am: The court resumes with Karpal’s reply. He reminds that it is the judge’s duty to ensure justice, as the court depends a lot on the experts’ evidence. "The expert is here to assist the court. He is duty-bound to tell the truth." Karpal promises to provide an Indian authority which the defence is relying on to show that the court can compel the clinical reports to be revealed. 11.24am: Justice Zabidin fixes Nov 22 to deliver its decision. |
| Isu Hutang Isi Rumah: UMNO-BN Sembunyi Laporan BNM Posted: 28 Oct 2010 08:04 PM PDT Dari Suara Keadilan Kerajaan Umno-Barisan Nasional cuba menyembunyikan pendedahan laporan Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) pada tahun 2009 berhubung hutang isi rumah yang meningkat secara ketara kepada 76.6% daripada 63.9% Keluaran Dalam Negara Kasar (KDNK) iaitu sebanyak RM389 bilion. Menurut Ahli Parlimen Kuala Selangor Dr Dzulkifly Ahmad berkata berdasarkan laporan tersebut, ia telah meletakkan negara di tahap yang tertinggi di Asia dari segi tanggungan hutang isi rumah.
“Lebih membimbangkan, Bajet 2011 langsung tidak menyebut apa-apa langkah konkrit untuk menangani masalah tersebut. “Gabenor BNM, Tan Sri Dr Zeti Akhtar Aziz telah menyebut bahawa mereka telah bersedia dengan pelbagai langkah institusi supaya paras hutang melebihi paras pruden. “Beliau juga menyebut bahawa tanda-tanda tekanan inflasi akibat daripada perbelanjaan masih belum kelihatan untuk sebarang campur tangan segera dan memadai dengan meningkat kadar Apungan Semalaman (OPR). Menurut Dr Dzulkifly,setakat ini Laporan Petunjuk Perbankan dan Monetari BNM oleh Institut Penyelidikan Ekonomi Malaysia (MIER) menunjukkan pinjaman isi rumah pada April hingga Jun tahun ini masing-masing berada pada 10 peratus, 11.7 peratus, 12.5 peratus, 11.9 peratus dan 11.8 peratus. “Pihak Kaunseling Kredit dan Agensi Pengurusan Hutang Kebangsaan (AKPK) tahun lalu turut merakamkan, hampir 50 peratus dari 3000 yang datang mendapatkan khidmat AKPK adalah dalam likungan umum 30 tahun hingga 40 tahun. “AKPK turut mendedahkan sebanyak 15 peratus mereka yang terbabit adalah dalam lingkungan usia 20an. |
| Kerjasama: UMNO Umpama Lebai Malang Posted: 28 Oct 2010 07:34 PM PDT Dari Harakah Umno terus membayangkan fobianya terhadap PAS apabila terus bertindak menghentam parti itu dalam isu kerjasama dengan DAP dalam Pakatan Rakyat. Mursyidul Am PAS, Tuan Guru Datuk Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat hairan dengan sikap Umno yang dianggap sebagai sebuah parti bertaraf elit sebelum ini tetapi pendek akal untuk memahami konsep atau matlamat kerjasama PAS-DAP. "Kadang-kadang terfikir juga pasal apa tak faham sangat Umno ini pada hal telah berkali-kali kita beri penjelasan. Perbezaan kerjasama antara Umno dan MCA serta MIC dalam Barisan Nasional (BN) dengan kerjasama antara PAS dan DAP dalam Pakatan Rakyat (PR) amat jelas.
"Kerjasama PAS dengan DAP dalam Pakatan tidak pernah menjejaskan prinsip PAS sebagai sebuah gerakan Islam. PAS masih dengan agenda Islamnya bahkan kami di Kelantan setiap tahun meraikan Hari Hudud," katanya dalam satu kenyataan hari ini. Beliau berkata demikian mengulas kenyataan Timbalan Presiden Umno, Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin yang disiarkan akhbar Utusan Malaysia semalam di bawah tajuk 'TPM bidas 'fatwa' ikut suka Pas'. "Perangai mereka macam biasalah, apa yang mereka buat ‘halal’ yang kita ‘haram’, yang dia masuk syurga, yang kita masuk neraka. Dari segi konteks kerjasama dengan masyarakat apa bezanya antara DAP dan MCA," Muhyiddin dipetik sebagai berkata ketika berkempen di Galas. Tuan Guru Nik Abdul Aziz berkata, secara umumnya pemimpin DAP hari ini tidak lagi menjadi kumpulan yang anti Islam sebaliknya beransur-ansur mengenali kesucian agama ini. Mengulas lanjut, beliau berkata kerjasama dengan DAP yang dikatakan sebagai chauvinis Cina tidak pernah menjejaskan prinsip PAS sebagai sebuah gerakan Islam. Tuan Guru menyifatkan Umno masih berfikir dengan kerangka perjuangan Melayu yang sempit sehingga tidak tahu menilai kesyumulan Islam secara keseluruhan. "Melayu pun tidak terbela, Islam pun tidak terjaga. Umpama Lebai Malang, ke hilir pun berlapar, ke hulu pun tidak kenyang. Kononnya, bila Melayu dan Islam ialah perkara yang sama. "Apa yang mereka tahu, hanya mengkritik orang saja," jelasnya. |
| You are subscribed to email updates from Anwar Ibrahim To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 | |
Tiada ulasan:
Catat Ulasan